Barron vs baltimore case School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v.Schempp definition10/24/2023 The Court, therefore, does not have jurisdiction to decide Barron’s case. Accordingly, the Fifth Amendment does not apply to the State of Maryland in the present case. Constitution do not use language that would lead the Court to believe that they were meant to apply to the States. As a result, a great deal of sand and earth accumulated by the wharf, making the water too shallow to dock most ships.īarron sued the Mayor and City of Baltimore to recover his financial loss because eventually the wharf was of little value.Ĭhief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, held that the amendments to the U.S. In order to expand and grow, the City of Baltimore diverted the flow of certain streams and paved many streets. The wharf was profitable because of the deep water surrounding it, allowing for large cargo vessels to dock. John Barron was a co-owner of a lucrative wharf in Baltimore harbor. The Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the case because the Fifth Amendment applies to the Federal government, not to the States.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |